Statistics
7,021 total views | Who I Am...Latest BlogsNo articles found
Wall - 1 followersLatest NewsNo articles found
| VideosYou can link to any video on RunnerSpace and put it in your video box on your profile! |
Great Oak 60 91:10
Saugus 107 92:15
Capistrano Valley 121 92:43
Redondo Union 163 92:32
Serrano 180 93:33
Palos Verdes 207 93:51
Bella Vista 219 93:50
Campolindo 220 93:31
Simi Valley 249 94:34
Esperanza 297 95:09
Same methodology as used for boys above.
Ventura 124 77:43
Brea Olinda 166 78:13
Jurupa Hills 180 78:10
Burroughs/burbank 199 78:52
Great Oak 211 78:48
Madera South 211 78:35
Dana Hills 212 78:39
Agoura 220 78:53
Saugus 249 78:55
Canyon/anaheim 253 79:17
I did this by merging all boys times, filtering the top 20 teams, then merging again (the correct method as I recall, though I didn't verify with the rule book). I didn't have tenths in the results and let the computer break ties alphabetically. Still this should be right within a few points.
First two teams go automatically, then the next two are eligible to be selected as at-large choices. Looking forward to seeing the official - good luck CA boys!
Andrew Gu, on , said:
I believe Flotrack hosted the webcast stream last year, but there is none this year.
There is not live webcast this year. DyeStatCAL will have videos after the meet, as well MileSplit I believe. Live Results can be viewed here: http://rtspt.com/events/cif/xc2014/
I believe Flotrack hosted the webcast stream last year, but there is none this year.
Heracles, on , said:
3rd-5th were behind by quite some margin and these are all ladies who have ran sub 11:00. (10:39 2-mile/10:46 3200, 10:37 3200, 10:52 3200. These three girls have been running faster than last season, so don't think it's simply a case of them being, "track runners". These two will definitely both be in the top 20 by the end of the season (although obviously I am expecting better results).
1 Devin Clark 12 Comal Smithson Valley 17:10.87
2 Paige Hofstad 11 New Braunfels 17:18.89
3 Julia Heymach 10 Houston Lamar 17:49.94
4 Ashton Endsley 10 Abilene 18:02.56
5 Abby Guidry 11 Humble Kingwood 18:06.47
Clark and Hofstad were very impressive at the Texas state meet. Looking forward to seeing how they do going forward.
Clark at 17 may be a little low, but now we have Stephanie Jenks to put back on the list ... and moving up starts to get a little tricky. The talent out there right now is pretty deep.
Yoyobo, on , said:
How high do you think she should be?
Keep in mind that she lost to the girl who his 26th on the list at Woodbridge. There will be some more adjustments, obviously, based on what happened this weekend.
3rd-5th were behind by quite some margin and these are all ladies who have ran sub 11:00. (10:39 2-mile/10:46 3200, 10:37 3200, 10:52 3200. These three girls have been running faster than last season, so don't think it's simply a case of them being, "track runners". These two will definitely both be in the top 20 by the end of the season (although obviously I am expecting better results).
1 Devin Clark 12 Comal Smithson Valley 17:10.87
2 Paige Hofstad 11 New Braunfels 17:18.89
3 Julia Heymach 10 Houston Lamar 17:49.94
4 Ashton Endsley 10 Abilene 18:02.56
5 Abby Guidry 11 Humble Kingwood 18:06.47